Corporate Security Intelligence
Connect security, people, operational and external signals so teams can identify emerging risk and coordinate action before loss, disruption or harm.
Results from a specific deployment. Efficiency describes output from existing guard resources, not verified spending reduction. Outcomes vary by environment, connected data and implementation.
Enterprise security outcomes
Heimdall combines internal operations with external intelligence so teams can act earlier, protect continuity and use security resources more effectively.
Problem: incidents, access, guards, properties and external risk remain separated across systems.
Earlier intervention, faster prioritization and less recurrence or severity where action is effective.
Problem: routine activity obscures the small number of changes that warrant investigation.
Less manual review, faster investigation and more focused analyst time.
Problem: police activity, weather, travel advisories and open-source intelligence are evaluated separately from internal operations.
Earlier preparation, reduced disruption and stronger business continuity.
Problem: traveler, destination, timing and local-risk information must be assembled manually.
Faster warnings, better-informed decisions and fewer avoidable disruptions.
Problem: evidence, decisions, ownership and remediation become fragmented across records and teams.
Faster resolution, stronger accountability and defensible documentation.
Problem: fixed patrols and generic assignments do not adjust as risk changes.
Better coverage, greater capacity with existing resources and measurable security performance.
Business impact: reduce loss exposure, improve security effectiveness, use existing resources more effectively and show what security delivered.
Security has data. It needs foresight.
Access, video, alarms, incidents, workforce, travel and operational systems each record part of the environment. Heimdall connects those records, learns normal patterns and reveals meaningful change while teams can still act.
It forecasts changing exposure, recommends the next action and gives authorized professionals the evidence, context and workflow to decide what happens next. Measured outcomes improve the next cycle.
Reveal combinations, concentration and change that isolated tools miss.
Route review and action to the right team with supporting context.
Track intervention, follow-through and outcome across sites and time.
Operating scenario
This operating pattern connects detection, ownership, response and verification. The connected sources, policies and response remain specific to each customer.
Access, incident and operating systems record related exceptions around a person, place or asset.
Baseline change, timing and related evidence are evaluated together instead of as isolated alerts.
An authorized professional receives the condition, supporting evidence and accountable next step.
The response and result become part of the operating record for future review and improvement.
Connected enterprise intelligence
Relevant internal and external data becomes one current view across people, places, assets, operations and time.
Access control, video, alarms, perimeter, visitor and life-safety systems.
Authorized workforce, contractor, behavior, training and compliance context.
Cases, investigations, EHS, claims, corrective actions and compliance.
Facilities, work orders, IoT, fleet, equipment and maintenance information.
Approved travel, weather, public-safety, geopolitical and OSINT signals.
Criticality, schedules, occupancy, operating conditions and risk tolerance.
Focused applications
Recognize meaningful behavioral, access and operational change for authorized review.
Turn patrol activity and site conditions into evidence-based deployment and service improvement.
Connect concerning signals, threat-management activity and response in one accountable workflow.
Identify concentration, exceptions and changing conditions across sites, systems and critical operations.
Beyond the alarm console
Customer proof and measured outcomes
Observed during the first five months after relevant security and incident data was connected.
Measured at a 1.7-million-square-foot commercial facility.
Davista’s deployment analysis found that risk-based patrol routing increased the output delivered by existing security resources.
Historical patterns and current operating context helped focus officers and technology where they were more likely to be useful.
More relevant deployment increased the likelihood that security was already nearby when service, safety or response needs emerged.
Improved observation and reporting produced better data for the next planning cycle, even when more complete reporting initially increased recorded activity.
“We’re seeing a huge reduction in activity levels that can only be attributed to the platform.”Security Director | Commercial-property customer
Results reflect Davista analysis of real deployment data. The efficiency measure describes output from existing guard resources in this deployment, not a verified reduction in spending. Outcomes vary by environment, reporting behavior, connected data and implementation scope.
Human-led by design
Heimdall identifies change, prioritizes risk and provides context. Your authorized professionals apply policy, determine intent and decide the appropriate action.
Enterprise security controls
Heimdall connects enterprise context while preserving customer-defined access, retention, workflows and accountability across the response lifecycle.
Review Enterprise Security Controls →Explore a Pilot
Tell us which operational outcome you want to improve. We’ll respond with a practical next step.